LGIM America and EDF: A new kind of climate partnership
By Neaaz Mozumder, Investment Stewardship Analyst, LGIM America and Andrew Howell, Director of Investor Influence, Environmental Defense Fund
A year ago, LGIM America (LGIMA) and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) announced a partnership to help “turbocharge investor leadership on climate change” and reduce emissions across high-emitting industries. Our shared plan focused on encouraging business leaders to advocate for key policies, helping companies move from planning to implementation, and addressing the growing demand for ESG-aligned investment options.
A year in, LGIMA’s Neaaz Mozumder and EDF’s Andrew Howell share their successes, what they’ve learned, and what’s next for the partnership.
Q: This kind of close collaboration between an investment firm and an environmental NGO is unusual. What was the rationale for setting it up?
Neaaz: As an investor, our core goal is to help protect our clients’ assets and aim to generate long-term value. Addressing the risks posed by the climate transition is one way we achieve that, which also aligns with some of what EDF works on. For us, this partnership offers three main value propositions: perspective, influence and expertise. EDF’s reputation as a thoughtful and pragmatic NGO is well earned, and we’ve benefited from the additional perspective on specific climate issues, their input and guidance on stewardship campaigns and focused technical expertise.
Andrew: EDF has a history of working closely with influential companies to empower them as environmental and climate stewards – our partners have included Walmart, McDonalds and Carrier. Given the critical role of the financial sector in addressing climate change, LGIMA is a logical partner for us as well. LGIMA has the scale and global scope to be impactful and has taken steps to use its voice to lead on sustainability and climate.
Q: What accomplishments from this first year of the partnership would you highlight?
Neaaz: One topic has been central to much of our work with EDF: methane. Thanks in part to EDF’s efforts, it is clear that reducing methane emissions can be a powerful and cost-effective way for oil and gas companies to make progress towards climate goals and manage regulatory and reputational scrutiny. Soon after the partnership kicked off last year, the Investment Stewardship team at LGIMA met with EDF to better understand the methane problem. EDF shared their research with us and other LGIMA teams. We also met with global oil and gas companies and marketplace data providers.
As we looked more deeply into the issue, we came to an alarming realization: despite the importance of methane to climate, the oil and gas industry is not on top of the issue. For starters, most companies don’t even know how much methane they are emitting. That means regulators don’t have good data on methane either, while investment data providers have little to say about it. It is clear that methane measurement and disclosure need to improve.
In consultation with EDF, we developed a methane strategy for our oil & gas portfolio companies. Fortunately, there is a robust framework for improving methane emissions disclosure called the Oil & Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP). We met with several large oil and gas companies urging them to join the Partnership, and with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to highlight shortcomings of existing disclosure regulations. We also submitted a comment letter to the International Sustainability Standards Board, urging adoption of key OGMP features. If implemented, it could have a sweeping impact on system wide disclosure practices.
Andrew: We believe LGIMA’s actions on methane will lead to real world emissions reductions. When investors engage with oil and gas companies, it sends a clear message to management teams that this is an issue that matters. It was also helpful that they met with the EPA – regulators need to hear the perspective of the investor community. LGIMA spoke out publicly on this issue as well by joining a webinar we hosted to share their perspective and publishing an op-ed in Barron’s. All these are welcome steps from the finance community.
Q: How has this partnership shaped how LGIMA approaches climate engagement?
Neaaz: The energy transition is a complex topic and can get technical very quickly. Investment firms, like LGIMA, do not necessarily have all of the scientific expertise to guide us through the nuances of each issue. This is why we’ve found it’s critical to engage with experts who can help us dig deeply into the challenges and solutions. EDF and other partners help us get smarter when engaging with companies.
Q: What has EDF learned from this partnership?
Andrew: The culture and perspective of an environmental NGO can be very different from that of an investor like LGIMA. One thing we learned is the importance of prioritization and how to narrowly focus on a small number of critical issues where investors can have the most impact. We also learned that much of the time, climate and maximizing shareholder value are more aligned than you might think. Methane is a great example. If you capture it rather than allow it to leak into the atmosphere, methane can have a monetary value that contributes to the bottom line.
Q: What issues or industries will the two organizations focus together on next?
Neaaz: Any sector that is carbon intensive may be susceptible to some form of risk, and where we can provide value as an investor is fair game. It’s not unlike the framework we apply to other issues in the Investment Stewardship group.
Andrew: Transportation is one area that EDF is starting to work more closely with investors on recently, as it represents more than 20 percent of global emissions. It has broad relevance because nearly every company uses trucks, airplanes, or other transportation modes to move goods and people. And yet, far too few companies disclose their transportation-related emissions or have committed to reducing them. Working with LGIMA to raise the urgency of this issue with their portfolio companies can benefit all those involved – there is no time to waste.
This material is intended to provide only general educational information and market commentary. Unless otherwise stated, references herein to "LGIM", "we" and "us" are meant to capture the global conglomerate that includes Legal & General Investment Management Ltd. (a U.K. FCA authorized adviser), LGIM International Limited (a U.S. SEC registered investment adviser and U.K. FCA authorized adviser), Legal & General Investment Management America, Inc. (a U.S. SEC registered investment adviser) and Legal & General Investment Management Asia Limited (a Hong Kong SFC registered adviser). The LGIM Stewardship Team acts on behalf of all such locally authorized entities. © 2022 Legal & General Investment Management Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying and recording, without the written permission of the publishers.
Views and opinions expressed herein are as of the date set forth above and may change based on market and other conditions. The material is for informational purposes only and is not intended as a solicitation to buy or sell any securities or other financial instrument or to provide any investment advice or service. Certain of the information contained herein represents or is based on forward-looking statements or information, including descriptions of anticipated market changes and expectations of future activity. Forward-looking statements and information are inherently uncertain and actual events or results may differ from those projected. Therefore, undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements and information. Strategies involving hedging, derivatives, futures and commodity interests present substantial risk of loss and are designed for sophisticated investors who are able to beat the risk of capital loss. LGIMA does not guarantee the timeliness, sequence, accuracy or completeness of information included. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance and no representation, express or implied, is made regarding future performance.